Rules for Lawyers Leaving Law Firms

The attached Article, written by Daniel J. Siegel, Esquire, and published in the July/August 2011 edition of the Pennsylvania Lawyer, provides an excellent overview on how a departing attorney must deal with his/her firm and its clients.

Generally, the rules are:

1.  Do not ask your clients to "come with" you until you after you have notified the firm that you are leaving;

2.  The best way to obtain clients consent to "take" their file with you is to send out a notification, preferably penned by you and the firm from which you are departing, wherein a full overview of the situation is provided, and requesting the clients to elect whom they want to have represent them in the future;

3.  It is the clients' choice as to whom will represent them in the future, and firms may not limit the clients' choice via any form of financial pressure.

Remember, if you are thinking of leaving your firm, you have a fiduciary duty to the firm which must remain inviolate until after you have announced your departure (and in fact beyond that as well, although to a far lesser degree).  That means you must be very careful about "laying the groundwork" for your departure until after you have announced your resignation. 

Obviously, the Rules of Ethics also impose strict requirements on your behavior during the transitional time period.

Hope that you found this helpful!  John A. Gallagher, Esquire, Pennsylvania Employment Lawyer.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/rules-for-lawyers-leaving-law-firms.html. Thanks!

Commissions, Minimum Wage and Overtime: What You Need to Know

A common scenario we encounter is as follows: a person is paid entirely or substantially on commissions.  They are deemed exempt from overtime by their employer.  Although they work more than 40 hours per week, they do not get paid overtime.  In some scenarios, they do not make enough in commissions to make even minimum wage. 

Some common areas we see this in: sales positions; wait staff.

For sales positions, employers often (incorrectly) deem employees to be exempt "outside salespersons," when in fact most of their work is performed in an office (whether a home office or one provided by the employer).  Such "inside sales" jobs are not exempt from the FLSA's overtime provisions.  If you perform such sales, you are entitled to both the minimum wage and overtime on all hours worked in excess of 40 in a given week.

Here are some important things to keep in mind:  If you are truly exempt from receiving overtime pay, then you are not required to be paid a minimum wage.  However, if you are not exempt from receiving overtime (and this is governed by the law, not by your employer's choice), then you must be paid the minimum wage.

That is so because the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") requires a covered employer to pay all non-exempt employees minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime compensation at one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for all hours exceeding 40 hours per workweek. 29 U.S.C. §§ 206(a)(1), 207(a)(2)  

In addition, if you are not truly exempt, then you must be paid overtime.

How do you determine whether you are being paid minimum wage?  Right now, the minimum wage in Pennsylvania is $7.25 (as it was in 2009 as well; in 2008, it was $7.15).  Add up the commissions you earn each week and divide by how many hours you actually worked during the week in question.  If the product of that equation is less than $7.25, you are owed the difference between the product and $7.25 for the first 40 hours tyou worked during the week in question.

For that same week, if you in fact worked more than 40 hours, you would be entitled to overtime pay at a rate of 1.5 x $7.25 (the minimum wage), or $10.88 per hour over 40.

Importantly, if you seek payment of a minimum wage or overtime from your employer, you are protected from termination pursuant to the anti-retaliation provisions of the FLSA. 

Click Here to read more about the FLSA
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/commissions-minimum-wage-and-overtime.html. Thanks!

The Disappearance of Jobs for the Middle Class

The attached Article from Forbes.com is not surprising, but it is nevertheless sad news - and evidence of the need to change our thinking when it comes to our careers.

Where have jobs for the middle class gone?  Technological advances are responsible for the replacement of man by machine.  This trend is only going to get worse.  What jobs have been most affected by technological advances?

*  Clerical workers
*  Travel Agents
*  Proofreaders
*  Broadcasters and news reporters (Thanks Internet!  Hello, Bloggers!)
*  Compensation and benefit managers

The (ongoing) economic crisis has also caused some business sectors to reduce payroll.  Those sectors include:

*  Advertising
*  agricultural engineering jobs

The Forbes.com Article also alludes to the loss of unions (or at least strong union influence) in the USA, but does not mention the tens of thousands of blue collar and clerical jobs that have been shipped oversees, or at least South of the Border.

However, another recent Article from Forbes.com sheds some more light on this factor, and on other jobs lost to technological advances, such as:

*  Mail sorters
*  Door to door sales and telemarketing
*  seamstresses and textile workers (what machines cannot do, women in more impoverished countries can)
*  Stage performers and live entertainers (it is all available on the Web or on Cable)

 What is the lesson?  Perhaps it is that many middle class workers need to become well-informed on computer/software/Internet-based technologies.  These are the advances that are on the cutting edge, and proficiency in one or more segments of such technological advances may be the "golden ticket" to long-term job security (or at least career-security, since the days of getting a gold watch after 30 years with the company seem to be largely behind us).

Over the past months, I have collected a number of resources discussing the best and worst of America's current job market.  Click Here to jump there.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/the-disappearance-of-jobs-for-middle.html. Thanks!

American Woman: Would You Marry For Love or Money?

The attached Article from HuffPost reveals some pretty interesting things about the modern woman, and humanity in general.

75% of women survey said that they would not marry a man that was unemployed.  At the same time, 90% said that they would marry for love over money.

What does that tell you?  I think it suggests that many women believe that a man who is unemployed is lazy or shiftless. At the same time, however, this statistic suggests that many women appear to be not unduly concerned about how much money their betrothed is making.  Indeed, 50% said they would marry a man who made significantly less than they did, while 41% said they would not.  Seems as though there are still a lot of traditionalists out there.

77% of women surveyed said they believed they could have it all: love, family and career.  Yet, 63% said they worked 40-59 hours per week, and 62% said they spend, on average, 3 waking hours with their loved one during the week.  Three hours?  Wow!  Doesn't anyone eat dinner together?  How about a cup of coffee in the morning?  A movie or favorite sitcom?  No, it seems as though many women are now doing what men have been doing for years (sometimes to the chagrin of their wives), coming home and chilling by themselves.  In fact, 42% of women surveyed said that if they had an extra hour per day, they would spend it alone, as opposed to with spouses, family or friends.

Interested in other women-based news, surveys and statistics?  Click Here to read more.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/american-woman-would-you-marry-for-love.html. Thanks!

Insights into retirement....

(The author is a financial planning coach,founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views to reachyourcoach@yahoo.com)



Insights into Retirement/ Pretirement


There have been several insights into retirement/ pretirement patterns. A recent survey captured some of the trends in retirement planning which are worth making note of for our benefit. A gist of the survey has been provided here for our readers...


1. Among other things,  GOOD FINANCIAL PLANNING has been ranked the most important tool for a happy retirement life.






2. On the comparison with our parents' generation, lack of security in career and jobs is ranked on the top of the list. Which in essence means we need follow a financial plan and that too to be implemented @ the earliest in our lives. The next on the list is on the lower returns on our investments.




3. Top financial worries on the retirement is about the unexpected events, followed by rising health costs and lack of performance in one's investments. Hence the importance of financial planning...






4. Most importantly and interestingly, the survey finds people who make financial plan have more savings and investments for their retirement life than the people who do not follow a plan.








Speak to experts @ Money Avenues NOW to make your retirement/ pretirement plan.





(The author is a financial planning coach,founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views at:  reachyourcoach@yahoo.com)



You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/insights-into-retirement.html. Thanks!

Cloud financial planning...


(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)



Cloud Financial Planning...


Our lives are getting more and more "Clouded" these days with advent of things such as cloud computing and iCloud. Let's also apply the cloud technique in our personal lives. Precisely in our own financial planning....





The financial planning can be complete only if it's properly linked to the various components of our personal finances. Our other personal priorities and work stress play havoc in our personal finances, leading to chaotic personal financial plans. Cloud financial planning has many components which are important ingredients in making an effective financial plan. They can be -


  • Future goals.
  • Smart investing.
  • Adequate life insurance.
  • Tax Planning.
  • Child Future.
  • Pretirement. 
Based on each individual, the plan changes or expands depending on the goals and priorities.


Consider making a financial plan NOW.... Cloud your life with a vibrant financial plan.



Speak to experts @ Money Avenues to make your financial plan.


(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)





You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/cloud-financial-planning.html. Thanks!

Pennsylvania Unemployment Deal Struck - Why It's a Bad Deal

On June 16, HuffPost published an Article indicating that Pennsylvania legislators struck a deal that would prevent 45,000 unemployed Pennsylvanians from losing unemployment benefits next week.  Actually, the bill was passed by the House (by vote of 194-0), and was approved by the Senate on Friday, June 17. It is expected that Governor Corbett will sign it into law shortly.

But it cost some real serious pork.

A few things about this deal that are really problematic: 1) it creates an agreed upon freeze of the maximum benefits amount (presently $573);  2) it apparently would amend existing law, which allows those receiving severance to also receive unemployment, so as to eliminate or minimize benefits for such persons; 3) it requires lower wage earners to be employed longer and earn more in order to qualify for benefits; and, 4) it "tightens up" job search requirements for those collecting unemployment.

Pa's legislators are touting this amendment as a "Reform Bill," i.e. a bill that corrects and eliminates certain provisions seen as less than ideal.  An examination of the "Reform Bill" demonstrates that almost all of the "take backs" are detrimental to future unemployment claimants, and not to Pennsylvania' employers.

One report indicates that "[t]he bill includes reform measures that require claimants to actively seek work, and increase the level of a credit week wage from $50 to $116. A new severance pay offset allows a person to receive severance pay of up to $17,853 before their unemployment benefits are affected."   The source of this information was a Press Release from  State Rep. Turzai (R), who lauds the Bill's reformative measures.

The Turzai Press Release says "[t]he average annual savings to the UC Trust Fund from 2012-2018 will be $133 million with the bulk of the savings in the last 4 years. The cumulative savings for 2011-2018 will be nearly $1 billion."  And exactly where is that $1 Billion going to come from?  Not from employers; the Bill does not create any new obligations on corporations that I can see.  Rather, all of the "savings" will result from the deprivation of benefits to claimants.
 
NOTE:  We have since this Post was published surmised that the nearly $1 Billion in projected savings will in large part come about via the disqualification of claimants who do not follow the new job search requirements.  Click Here to read more on that issue.

I believe this is a real bad deal for Pennsylvanians.  Robbing Peter to pay Paul, it seems to me.  One can see that, in the long run, the Government will come out ahead and the Pennsylvania workforce behind.  After all, while it is wonderful to help those 45,000 in need, there are far more future claimants who will be hurt by this bill.  And, I don't personally expect to see any sort of reduction in my company's future unemployment tax, or in my personal unemployment tax contribution.  The bill doesn't provide for that.

Pennsylvania's Unemployment Compensation Act was last amended in 1988.  Since that time, and particularly since the recent economic crisis, there have been calls to "reform" the Act - and that is exactly what has happened here.  As the aforementioned HuffPost article noted:

"When the U.S. Congress reauthorized federal extended benefits in December, federal lawmakers told states they'd need to tweak their laws to remain eligible for the final regimen of aid. Twenty-six states have taken Congress up on the offer, most of them doing so without any controversy. But Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states where keeping the federal dollars became leverage for proposals to curtail state spending on the jobless."

In my view, it would have been far better to pass this Bill, and thereby help the 45,000 people in need, without dinging future claimants.  Instead, Pennsylvania's legislators used the current financial crisis as an excuse to "reform" Pennsylvania's unemployment law to the great detriment of many unsuspecting future claimants.  Yet, there are no reformative measures where corporations are concerned, despite the fact that it is well known that many employers refuse to even consider applications from people who are currently unemployed.  So, Pennsylvania Legislators, why not take the next step by passing a bill that would require corporations to do something - like employ unemployed workers who are being shunned like lepers?

Why not pass a bill that, rather than make future unemployed workers pay for it, require Pennsylvania businesses to do something to help the currently unemployed, such as an Affirmative Action Plan, which would eliminate obviously prevalent discrimination against the unemployed?  Why should future unemployed have to pay for this, when businesses across America are intentionally refusing to hire unemployed workers, thus deepening our economic crisis, and causing personal tragedies across America.

What, you say?  Campaign contributions?  Oh, got it. The sad truth is that most of our elected officials are frequently most concerned with their most important constituents - the corporations that fund their election campaigns (and particularly their reelection campaigns!).  Recession or not, there really is nothing new under the sun.  Skeptical of my acerbic conclusion?

Consider the "Tort Reform" campaign that swept across America a few years ago....Or the fact, as noted in the wonderful Oscar-Award winning documentary "Inside Job," that our government stood by and did absolutely nothing even though it knew that Wall Street executives were intentionally misleading the public to line their own pockets with gold - creating a debt we still have not paid (although not a single perpetrator of the frauds has been arrested or asked to pay a dime of restitution).
 
MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT LAW?  Click Here to read our answers to FAQs.

John A. Gallagher, Esquire
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/pennsylvania-unemployment-deal-struck.html. Thanks!

CHARLIE SHEEN GOING TO HAVE TO WIN IN ARBITRATION

Well, Charlie Sheen has lost the first battle in his litigation against his former employer.  His case is being sent into arbitration.  Plaintiffs typically do not like arbitrations. 

Why?

Jurors are typically more sympathetic to the little guy than corporations (or, In Charlie's case, more starstruck!). 

Companies prefer arbitration over jury trials.

Why?

First, ask yourself, how do arbitrators get work?  From companies that include arbitration clauses in contracts (employees sure don't ask for them).  So, logic dictates, if you are an arbitrator that wants more appointments, a little favoritism towards the company can't hurt....

Second, ask yourself, in a case between a company and an employee, who is typically in control of information about the work relationship?  The Employer.  So, whereas in ordinary litigation there is a great deal of discovery, not so much in arbitration. 

Anyway, we still think Charlie's suit is Winning.  Why?  Click Here to read our article, "Inside the Charlie Sheen Lawsuit:  No Good Deed Goes Unpunished," published by IMDb,  Hollywood News, TLNT, and others.

Want some more "behind the scenes" insight on what it was like on the the set of 2 1/2 Men?  Click Here.

Recently, Charlie applied for a job and was interviewed.  We got that exclusive.  Read it Right Here.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/charlie-sheen-going-to-have-to-win-in.html. Thanks!

ARE YOU REALLY A BONA FIDE EXECUTIVE EXEMPT FROM RECEIVING OVERTIME?

IS IT POSSIBLE I AM ENTITLED TO OVERTIME EVEN THOUGH MY EMPLOYER SAYS I AM A BONA FIDE EXECUTIVE?

Many, many employers misclassify their employees as being exempt from overtime, when in fact the employees are non-exempt (i.e. entitled to overtime). One could surmise this is not always accidental, since overtime is expensive!

The job title given to the employee does not matter; paper job descriptions do not matter. What matters is what the employee actually does on a regular basis.  In fact, just today (June 15, 2011), the 9th Circuit held that employers may not categorically define a class of employees (in that case, Junior Accountants) as either exempt or non-exempt, requiring instead that employers consider the specific job duties of each employee.

HOW DO I KNOW IF I AM A BONA FIDE EXECUTIVE EXEMPT FROM RECEIVING OVERTIME? 

One of the most common misclassification errors has to do with the bona fide executive classification. The general rule for exemption of executive employees provides in relevant part that:

(a) The term "employee employed in a bona fide executive capacity" . . . shall mean any employee:

(1) Compensated on a salary basis at a rate of not less than $ 455 per week . . . exclusive of board, lodging or other facilities;

(2) Whose primary duty is management of the enterprise in which the employee is employed or of a customarily recognized department or subdivision thereof;

(3) Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees; and

(4) Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion or any other change of status of other employees are given particular weight. 29 C.F.R. § 541.100 (2005).

THIS IS A CONJUNCTIVE LEGAL TEST.  That means that the employee must meet all four of these test parts in order to be qualifed as a bona fide executive exempt from receiving overtime. 
The financial terms of the test are outdated ($23,660 per year?!); the remaining prongs really go to the heart of the issue.  These are the prongs that attorneys typically delve deeply into when trying to win lawsuits for misclassified "executives."

THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS BONA FIDE EXECUTIVE RULE

One court has explained this exemption as follows:

The FLSA provides generally that covered, nonexempt employees must receive not less than a stated minimum wage for all hours worked, and overtime premium pay for all hours worked over forty hours in a workweek. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 206(a)(1), 207(a)(1). Exemptions are made for certain "white collar" salaried employees. n1 Among the statutory exemptions from these requirements is the exemption contained at 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1) for persons employed in a bona fide executive capacity. This exemption…is defined and explained in DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. §§ 541.100 -.106 (2005).

See 29 C.F.R. § 541.3 (2005). ("The . . . exemptions and the regulations in this part do not apply to manual laborers or other 'blue collar' workers who perform work involving repetitive operations with their hands, physical skill and energy. Such nonexempt 'blue collar' employees gain the skills and knowledge required for performance of their routine manual and physical work through apprenticeships and on-the-job training, not through the prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction required for exempt learned professional employees such as medical doctors, architects and archeologists.").

CAN I FILE A LAWSUIT TO COLLECT UNPAID OVERTIME?

Yes. Since FLSA is a federal statute, you can sue in your local federal court. And, if you win, you get $2 for every $1 the employer failed to pay to you. There is essentially a presumption that most federal courts courts draw in favor of employees being entitled to overtime. Hence, courts construe overtime laws narrowly against employers.

Many states have state laws governing overtime laws as well. While many of them are interpreted the same as the FLSA, it is still a good idea to familiarize yourself with the laws of your state before filing suit.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR OVERTIME CLAIMS?

The statute of limitations for an FLSA overtime claim is 3 years if the failure to pay is deemed intentional (which it often is) and 2 years if it is deemed inadvertent.

Some states may have different statutes of limitations.

More questions about overtime and the FLSA?  Click Here.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/are-you-really-bona-fide-executive.html. Thanks!

Are You Really Doing Outside Sales So That You Are Exempt From Overtime?

IS IT POSSIBLE I AM ENTITLED TO OVERTIME EVEN THOUGH MY EMPLOYER SAYS I AM DOING OUTSIDE SALES?

Many, many employers misclassify their employees as being exempt from overtime, when in fact the employees are non-exempt (i.e. entitled to overtime).  One could surmise this is not always accidental, since overtime is expensive!

The job title given to the employee does not matter; paper job descriptions do not matter.  What matters is what the employee actually does on a regular basis. 

One of the most common misclassification errors has to do with the Outside Sales classification.  Sometimes, this comes up in connection with commissioned salespeople, who may also be unlawfully deprived of being paid the minimum wage for each hour worked.

To be truly engaged in Outside Sales, one must regularly engage in performing Outside Sales; the employee's primary duty must be engaging in outside sales.  Often, if an employee spends less than 50% of the time engaging in outside sales, he/she will be deemed non-exempt, and thus entitled to overtime (in Pennsylvania, as discussed below, an employee may not be deemed an exempt outside salesperson unless they spend 80% or more of their time performing outside sales)..

WHAT ARE "OUTSIDE" SALES UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARD ACT?


The short and sweet of it is as follows:  Outside Sales mean sales efforts that are undertaken at the place of business of the potential customer.  Thus, people that make cold calls from a telephone all day are not engaged in Outside Sales, even though they are attempting to make sales by calling customers who are located elsewhere from the employee.

The Code of Federal Regulations, which have been enacted to provide guidance on FLSA exemptions, and which are relied upon by most courts, state: “[t]he outside sales employee is an employee who makes sales at the customer's place of business or, if selling door-to-door, at the customer's home. Outside sales does not include sales made by mail, telephone or the Internet unless such contact is used merely as an adjunct to personal calls…

WHAT ARE OUTSIDE SALES UNDER PENNSYLVANIA'S MINIMUM WAGE ACT?

People employed in Pennsylvania have additional protections where overtime is concerned pursuant to the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act ("PMWA").  Perhaps most importantly, under PMWA, you may not be deemed an outside salesperson unless you are spending 8o% or more of your time performing outside sales.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE "MAKING SALES?"

Typically, when construing what it means to be performing outside sales, the standards established by the federal regulations pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act govern claims under both state and federal laws.  Here is what the federal laws says about what it means to be "making sales."

Whether an employee is engaged in "making sales" within the meaning of this exemption is a fact-intensive inquiry dependent on each employee's job responsibilities and duties.  In this connection, the CFR states the following:   

Another example [discussing the outside sales exemption set forth in the regulations] is a company representative who visits chain stores, arranges the merchandise on shelves, replenishes stock by replacing old with new merchandise, sets up displays and consults with the store manager when inventory runs low, but does not obtain a commitment for additional purchases. The arrangement of merchandise on the shelves or the replenishing of stock is not exempt work unless it is incidental to and in conjunction with the employee's own outside sales. Because the employee in this instance does not consummate the sale or direct efforts toward the consummation of a sale, the work is not exempt outside sales work.

With regard to the “primary duty” component of the test, the regulations state:

(a) To qualify for exemption under this part, an employee's "primary duty" must be the performance of exempt work. The term "primary duty" means the principal, main, major or most important duty that the employee performs. Determination of an employee's primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, with the major emphasis on the character of the employee's job as a whole. Factors to consider when determining the primary duty of an employee include, but are not limited to, the relative importance of the exempt duties as compared with other types of duties; the amount of time spent performing exempt work; the employee's relative freedom from direct supervision; and the relationship between the employee's salary and the wages paid to other employees for the kind of nonexempt work performed by the employee.

(b) The amount of time spent performing exempt work can be a useful guide in determining whether exempt work is the primary duty of an employee. Thus, employees who spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt work will generally satisfy the primary duty requirement. Time alone, however, is not the sole test, and nothing in this section requires that exempt employees spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt work. Employees who do not spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt duties may nonetheless meet the primary duty requirement if the other factors support such a conclusion.

(c) Thus, for example, assistant managers in a retail establishment who perform exempt executive work such as supervising and directing the work of other employees, ordering merchandise, managing the budget and authorizing payment of bills may have management as their primary duty even if the assistant managers spend more than 50 percent of the time performing nonexempt work such as running the cash register. However, if such assistant managers are closely supervised and earn little more than the nonexempt employees, the assistant managers generally would not satisfy the primary duty requirement.

CAN I FILE A LAWSUIT TO COLLECT UNPAID OVERTIME?

Yes.  Since FLSA is a federal statute, you can sue in your local federal court.  And, if you win, you get $2 for every $1 the employer failed to pay to you.  There is essentially a presumption that most federal courts courts draw in favor of employees being entitled to overtime.  Hence, courts construe overtime laws narrowly against employers.

Many states have state laws governing overtime laws as well.  While many of them are interpreted the same as the FLSA, it is still a good idea to familiarize yourself with the laws of your state before filing suit.  For example, anyone filing a claim for overtime involving the outside sales exemption would certainly want to include a claim under the PMWA, with its 80% "bright line rule."

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR OVERTIME CLAIMS?

The statute of limitations for an FLSA overtime claim is 3 years if the failure to pay is deemed intentional (which it often is) and 2 years if it is deemed inadvertent. 

Some states may have different statutes of limitations.

More questions about overtime and the FLSA?  Click Here.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/are-you-really-doing-outside-sales-so.html. Thanks!

PA Unemployment Referees

WHAT DO PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREES DO?

Pennsylvania Unemployment Referees decide unemployment appeals from decisions by the Unemployment Service Center.  Among the issues they decide are willful misconduct; voluntary quits; independent contractor status; and, overpayments.
WHAT HAPPENS IN A HEARING BEFORE A PA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREE?

A Hearing before an Unemployment Referee is a recorded process where the witnesses are sworn in, and evidence (both verbal and written) is introduced.  Typically, Referees issue their decision within 2 weeks of the Hearing date.  They almost never decide the case at the Hearing, and sometimes take longer than 2 weeks to issue their decision.

HOW DOES A PERSON BECOME A PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREE?

To become a PA Unemployment Referee, one has to receive training and test out.  Some Referees are attorneys, but many are not.  All Referee's are employed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

DO PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREES HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW?

Whether attorneys are not, most Referees are intimately familiar with the law of unemployment in Pennsylvania, which over the years has largely been developed by Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court (an intermediate appeals court that typically handles appeals involving the Commonwealth and its agencies).  If you do not know the precedent that has been established by the Commonwealth Court, you are going into a Hearing with one arm tied behind your back.

The Referees are also very familiar with the rules of evidence, and particularly those governing relevance and hearsay.  Therefore, they tend to conduct sharply focused hearings, and will (assuming proper objections are made) only consider credible, relevant, non-hearsay evidence.

WHERE DO PA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREES WORK?

Referees typically are assigned to one location, where they go to work everyday.  In Southeastern Pennsylvania, those are Hearing Offices located in Norristown, Malvern, Springfield, Bristol, Philadelphia, Reading and Lancaster. 

Referees usually handle anywhere from 4-8 Hearings each and every day.  They know exactly what they are doing, and the more experienced Referees have probably heard your "fact pattern" a hundred times.  I find that the overwhelming majority are "fair," although there are of course those that can be categorized as very conservative (favor employers) or liberal (favor employees).

ARE THERE RULES ON HOW TO CONDUCT PA UNEMPLOYMENT HEARINGS?

A few.  They must be recorded.  Witnesses must be sworn.  The evidence must be presented in a certain order depending upon the "burden of proof" in the case.  Other than that, there really aren't any. 

Some Referees tend to want to control the Hearing, putting themselves in the forefront by asking questions of both sides before allowing representatives (such as lawyers) to ask any questions.  Others take a different approach, requiring the parties to establish their case all by their selves, with periodic questions from the Referee.  There are no set rules on this; to each Referee his/her own.

WILL THE REFEREE PROTECT ME IN A HEARING?

 Referees will not act as an advocate for either side.  Thus, if you do not present evidentiary objections (such as relevance or hearsay), do not expect them to "bail you out" by raising and ruling upon such issues on their own motion.

CAN I APPEAL A PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT REFEREE'S DECISION?

Yes, such appeals are decided by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Appeals to the UCBOR are "paper appeals."  Unless you have raised evidentiary or legal issues that have been mishandled by the Referee, do not expect to win such an appeal.  Referee's are almost never overturned merely because the decision was unfair, or because the Referee chose to believe one side over the other.  Also, if you "forgot" to introduce evidence at the Hearing, do not expect to have the right to introduce such "new evidence" to the UCBOR.

You get one bite at the apple - and it is before the Referee.

More questions about Pennsylvania Unemployment law?  See our comprehensive answers to FAQs.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/pa-unemployment-referees.html. Thanks!

What is Affirmative Action and How Can it Help the 99ers and the Chronically Unemployed?

An Affirmative Action plan is one that requires employers to hire X number of unemployed applicants for every Y number of employed applicants that it hires. I guess you would call it a quota....

Right now, there is a strong suspicion that unemployed workers are not being considered, much less hired, for many job vacancies (rather, many employers are looking to hire only people who are currently employed).

An Affirmative Action Plan would make it illegal for companies to engage in such selective hiring (if that is what they are doing). Going forward, employers would have to regularly report to the US Government that they were hiring at least X number of unemployed workers for every Y number of jobs.

Back in the 70s, Affirmative Action plans were used to insure equality when it came to things such as admission practices to universities. The term has a bad connotation because it seemed that a lot of times more qualified (white) applicants were being denied just so less qualified (black) applicants could be admitted so colleges could meet their quota. Even so, it was in part quite a successful plan.

In any event, requiring companies to hire a certain percentage of unemployed workers to meet a quota would not have the same type of stigma...

I read a lot of 99ers stuff, and many seem to be focusing on getting additional unemployment benefits. Indeed there has been a great deal of focus on House Bill 589, which proposes to get 99ers 13 more weeks of benefits.  But, I assume, the purpose of the bill is to give chronically unemployed Americans a shot at economic survival until they can find a job....Yet, if indeed employers are refusing to hire unemployed workers, then the bill is quite short-sighted and does nothing to address a much greater problem.

The other problem with HB 589, is that it kind of feeds right into the mentality of people who claim that unemployment is just another form of welfare. Not only that, but the chance of it passing (at the expense of millions) is remote.  99ers don't need or want government handouts - they want a job!

Besides, what good does it do to get another 3 months of welfare if one's long term goal of getting back to work is only being stifled by a longer period of unemployment.

If you ask 99ers if they would prefer 3 months of UC benefits versus a job paying them a decent wage, I think almost all would say the job. The concept of Affirmative Action appeals to those 99ers, I would think.
You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-is-affirmative-action-and-how-can.html. Thanks!

Do you plan to "Pretire"? Read on...




(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)




Do you plan to "Pretire" from work? Read on...


People opt for "pretirement" than retirement these days.
Calls of passion lead to pretirement, which basically means cut short your present career and choose something else guided by your passion.



"I ME MYSELF" syndrome is catching up like anything. People like never before are willing to explore things outside their organizations and careers. "Woodian" outlook is catching up fast with the current crop of professionals and executives.



To know more about John Wood's inspirational story....

http://www.leavingmicrosoftbook.com/author.html



Pursuit of passion has triggered an increasing urge among the people to "pretire" from "job", if not retire from jobs. This is because of variety of reasons.. Passion may be for turning into an entrepreneur, take up social work, pursue different career paths, pursue other hobbies or just play golf...


The age old retirement milestone of 58 years is getting drastically shrunk which is reflected by rising urge for people to break away from the convention. For instance, my father had a career with government for cool 35 years, which is unimaginable these days. Though the average shelf life in current careers has shrunk, the higher salaries make up for the shrunken shelf life of our jobs.

And interestingly such deviation from our regular journey may happen in a trigger's moment and may not be according to the script. John Wood's one trekking adventure changed his life forever. But remember, this kind of a scenario can still be handled effectively if meticulous planning has been adopted in the early stages of life. A sound financial plan early on can only support such moves by passion driven people.


Now, what do you have to do to handle "Pretirement" passions?


1. Identify your goals and keep revisiting them constantly:



"To get started, you must have a destination" 

--These are prophetic words on goal setting. You must try to figure out your goals early on in your life. And more importantly you must revisit them time and again for changes to be incorporated. And remember, goals come @ a financial cost to you. Start working on your goals in order to identify and pursue them.



2. Start investing early:





Obviously you cannot start planning to invest @ 40 and plan for pretirement at the same time. Start your investing much early in life ideally through the route of easy monthly investments (EMIs). Never wait for "tomorrows" to start the financial plan as there is a huge cost for delays you might have to pay in the absence of it.





3. Start investing smartly:




Just starting the investment early is just not enough. The investing should be smart and aimed at long term wealth creation. Keeping one's money in low yielding avenues will not help one to plan for pretirement for sure. Seek the assistance of financial planners to earn more out of your savings.



4. Have enough health cover:








Organizations provide health cover to an extent while during the stay there. But once out of the organization, one has to be independent and self dependent. It's advisable to have a parallel health cover even during the career as its cost effective if taken much early. Imagine I decide to pretire @ 45 and try to seek a health cover for myself and the family. It will be lot more expensive and time consuming than taking such a cover @ 30. And remember the health care costs are sky rocketing.





5. Have enough life cover:

  


Having ample cover for one's life will be critical while making decision to pretire. The reason being, the family in many cases will be dependent on this kind of financial security in one's absence. In simple words, life insurance is nothing but a financial cover for one's family in his absence. Simply put, Mr X is covered for his life for 50 lacs @ the age of 40. At 45, mishap strikes to take away Mr X. On this event his family gets Rs 50 lacs as financial compensation. It is an important component of a financial plan because, any mishap at a later stage should not in any way impact the family's financial future. So in a way this is a contingency fund for a family.



6. Plan for your child's future:





Planning for child's future should precede the pretirement plan of an individual. Like our passions, the children are also typically guided by their passions, aspirations, goals and objectives. And they definitely come @ a huge cost these days and the future is even more scary with the surge of educational costs. So plan early for their future to ensure a smooth pretirement plan for yourself.


  
7. Plan for Pretirement/retirement NOW:







Make a financial plan NOW keeping all the above factors in mind. 


1. Have goals.
2. Start saving early.
3. Start saving smartly.
4. Have a good health cover.
5. Have ample life cover.
6. Plan for your child's future.
7. Make a plan NOW...


"To get started, you must have a destination". 

This not only applies to your goals, but also for your financial planning.


Speak to experts @ Money Avenues to make your financial plan and realize your pretirement goals



(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai.Mail your views at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)







You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/do-you-plan-to-read-on.html. Thanks!

Financial Planning for future: Building block by block.....



(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai. Mail him at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)




Building block by block is how we learnt to count the numbers and alphabets in our childhood. And that's what we practice on building our lifestyles through EMIs for buying homes, cars, expensive TVs. But this EMI which is equated monthly instalment typical creates liability and not exactly the asset. But in essence, we follow the basics of a kindergarten kid. Achieving bigger things block by block....


Same is the case with our financial planning. Achieve bigger things in life block by block through EMIs.







Easy Monthly Investments (EMIs)

EMIs (Easy Monthly Investments) are key to achieving our financial goals through the financial planning. And they help you create long term assets.

Easy monthly investments can help you achieve your following financial goals:




1. Inflation Shield:






Inflation is a monster which is capable of derailing the best of all future plans, if not handled the right way. To begin with, It's not prudent to keep much of your money in a bank savings which earns 3.5% pa.. And compare that with inflation which is around 10-11%. Instead do an EMI into products like equity which can effectively beat the inflation hands down and generate good returns over the longer periods. Inflation hedge will have to be a key financial goal for the future and suitable investment strategy should be built around that goal.

For eg., 
If you keep 1 lac in a bank savings a/c, after a year it would have given Rs 1,03,500 @ 3.5%.

On the other hand, had you parked the same 1 lac in an avenue which earned 15%, it would have given Rs 1,15,000. This difference is only for one year. But this equation can cause havoc over the longer term due to the effect of compounding. Keeping money in the bank is definitely not the right option to fight the inflation monster.

Have a set amount every month through an EMI for your regular saving into an appropriate avenue. Remember, saving alone is not important.



2. Long term wealth creation:




Inflation hedge is just a part of the overall investment strategy, the larger aim should be to create long term wealth creation. The Easy Monthly Investing (EMIs) is the best possible way to create long term wealth and to meet the "expect the unexpected" situations.


3. Personal life cover:



In simple words, life insurance is nothing but a financial cover for one's family in his absence. Simply put, Mr X is covered for his life for 50 lacs @ the age of 40. At 45, mishap strikes to take away Mr X. On this event his family gets Rs 50 lacs as financial compensation. It is an important component of a financial plan because, any mishap at a later stage should not in any way impact the family's financial future. So in a way this is a contingency fund for a family.

As one grows in career and income levels, its ideal that the person should always maintain the insurance cover at the prevailing income levels. For eg., X's salary is 10 Las PA and he has a cover of 50 lacs. If his salary moves up to 15 lacs after few years, his insurance should also increase correspondingly, in this case it should go up to 75 lacs.

Thumb rule for taking an insurance cover is "earlier the better" which means the cost of cover goes up with one's age. Two people aged 30 and 40 will have substantially different premiums for the same amount of cover. 

And opting for life insurance through EMI is always the easiest option in a financial plan.


4. Children future plans: 


While planning for a child's future easy monthly investments (EMIs) will be very handy  both through annuities and equities. It's also important to start the planning right now keeping in view of the future costs. In our estimates, cost of professional education which is Rs 7.5 lacs now can be Rs 61 lacs after 15 years. So EMIs will help you plan for such financial goals and "expect the unexpected" situations in their future plan.




5. Pretirement planning:



There is a growing urge to pretire in life. Pretirement means many things; retire from work, start own venture, work for social causes, or jus play golf all the time...


Typical every one wants to pretire from job, but not from income. The ideal way to create our pretirement fund is take the EMI route and create wealth for our pretirement goals.


Speak to experts @ Money Avenues for the best financial planning solutions and build your financial goals block by block.




(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai. Mail him at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)



You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/financial-planning-for-future-building.html. Thanks!

When education becomes more precious....


(The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai. Mail him at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)


In a rather peculiar and bizarre incident, a distressed dad in the US put his precious collection of 19 Rolex watches on eBay for auction.......

http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/2011/6/7/man-lists-19-rolexes-on-ebay-in-hopes-of-sending-child-to-co.html






The reason:


To fund his son's college education at UCLA (Univ of California, LA) ............ 




When there are other better ways to fund children education, why do things which are distress in nature. One such tool is to make a children education plan right now when the child is relatively young; and that can be definitely handy when they get ready for their education. After all, inflation is galloping on every side of the economy. Education cost will not be an exception to this.




In our estimates


  • A professional education which may cost Rs 7.5 lacs now, will cost about Rs 61 lacs after 15 years. 
  • Overseas education which may cost Rs 15 lacs now, might cost about Rs 1.23 Crores after 15 years.


    Talk to experts @ Money Avenues to know and make perfect children future plans.....



    (The author is a financial planning coach, founder and CEO of Money Avenues, a Wealth Management firm based in Chennai. Mail him at:  finplancoach@gmail.com)


    You have read this article with the title June 2011. You can bookmark this page URL http://clapclapclappp.blogspot.com/2011/06/when-education-becomes-more-precious.html. Thanks!